sitemap
FOLLOW SNITCHSEEKER:

Email Us!

Members

There are 999 users online including...
badger_boy_93 , BrisaHep

2 members
997 guests.

Members in Chat:



If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   SnitchSeeker.com > Forums > Daily Prophet (News) > Harry Potter News

Notices

Harry Potter News Fresh off the press! Stay informed on the latest Harry Potter news, updates, and whispers here. All News Rules and FAQs apply.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 04-19-2011, 06:47 PM
katiebell katiebell is offline
 
Post J.K. Rowling discusses her relationship with Potter screenwriter Steve Kloves

J.K. Rowling wrote an article for the April/May 2011 issue of the Writers Guild’s WGAW Written By magazine, detailing her relationship with Harry Potter screenwriter Steve Kloves, from the day they met, through their collaboration on the films and their continuing friendship to this day.



Here is an excerpt:

Quote:
Steve and I were introduced, in L.A., by David Heyman, the producer, and we almost immediately went into a lunchtime meeting with a big studio executive. Three things happened within a couple of hours that caused every qualm to vanish and made me adore Steve, an attitude from which I haven’t deviated in 13-odd years.

Firstly, Steve turned to me while food was being ordered and said quietly, “You know who my favorite character is?” I looked at him, red hair included, and I thought: You’re going to say Ron. Please, please don’t say Ron–Ron’s so easy to love. And he said: “Hermione.” At which point, under my standoffish, mistrusting exterior, I just melted, because if he got Hermione, he got the books. He also, to a large extent, got me.

Lunch proceeded, and the senior exec held forth, dominated conversation. It swiftly became obvious to me that in spite of all the effusive praise of the novels he was pouring forth, he hadn’t read a page of them. (A reliable source had told me later the exec had read “the coverage,” which he always felt was more useful than reading the original material.) Next, he began to suggest things that would need changing, primarily Harry’s character. “No, that won’t work,” Steve said pleasantly. When lunch was over, David, Steve, and I went off for coffee together. On the way, Steve opined that you had to tell “them” up front what would work and what wouldn’t. No point prevaricating. I was now in a state of profound admiration.

When it was time to say goodbye, I wrote my email address down for Steve on the back of a torn receipt in my wallet. He read the address, then flipped over the receipt and said, “Penny Black–what’s that?” I said: “It’s the make of the top I’m wearing.” He tucked the receipt away muttering, “I just like knowing stuff like that.” As odd names on scraps of paper are perennially fascinating to me too, that clinched my feeling that I’d met a kindred spirit.
The entire article can be read below.

SPOILER!!: When Steve Met Jo
Quote:
When Steve Met Jo
Harry Potter’s creator remembers her collaboration with Steve Kloves

Written by J.K. Rowling

I was kept informed about the people who were in the running to adapt the script, but it wasn’t my call. I heard that Warners was interested in having Steve Kloves do something for them and had been looking for a project that appealed to him. I believe he was shown a few things. He told me that Potter was the only one that interested him; I don’t think he was just being nice.

I knew he’d written and directed The Fabulous Baker Boys, which was a plus because I loved that film and everything about it. Nevertheless, I was incredibly wary before I met him. He was going to butcher my baby. He was an established screenwriter, which was just plain intimidating. He was also American, and we were meeting shortly after a review of the first Potter book in (I think) the New Yorker, which had stated that it was unlikely the British idiom would translate to an American audience. You have to remember that my first Warner Bros. meeting did not take place against a backdrop of massive American success for the novels. Although the books were already very popular in the U.K., it was still early days in the U.S., and I therefore had no real means of backing up my opinion that American fans of the book would rather not have Hagrid “translated” for the big screen, for instance.

Steve and I were introduced, in L.A., by David Heyman, the producer, and we almost immediately went into a lunchtime meeting with a big studio executive. Three things happened within a couple of hours that caused every qualm to vanish and made me adore Steve, an attitude from which I haven’t deviated in 13-odd years.

Firstly, Steve turned to me while food was being ordered and said quietly, “You know who my favorite character is?” I looked at him, red hair included, and I thought: You’re going to say Ron. Please, please don’t say Ron–Ron’s so easy to love. And he said: “Hermione.” At which point, under my standoffish, mistrusting exterior, I just melted, because if he got Hermione, he got the books. He also, to a large extent, got me.

Lunch proceeded, and the senior exec held forth, dominated conversation. It swiftly became obvious to me that in spite of all the effusive praise of the novels he was pouring forth, he hadn’t read a page of them. (A reliable source had told me later the exec had read “the coverage,” which he always felt was more useful than reading the original material.) Next, he began to suggest things that would need changing, primarily Harry’s character. “No, that won’t work,” Steve said pleasantly. When lunch was over, David, Steve, and I went off for coffee together. On the way, Steve opined that you had to tell “them” up front what would work and what wouldn’t. No point prevaricating. I was now in a state of profound admiration.

When it was time to say goodbye, I wrote my email address down for Steve on the back of a torn receipt in my wallet. He read the address, then flipped over the receipt and said, “Penny Black–what’s that?” I said: “It’s the make of the top I’m wearing.” He tucked the receipt away muttering, “I just like knowing stuff like that.” As odd names on scraps of paper are perennially fascinating to me too, that clinched my feeling that I’d met a kindred spirit.

The important thing to know is that I had complete confidence in him, from that one meeting in L.A. He’d said enough during those few hours together to convince me that he had a real connection to the characters. As we subsequently agreed during our decade-plus email conversation about the books, when you strip away all of the diversionary magic, the Potter novels boil down to the characters; our relationship with them and theirs with each other.

Under the Invisibility Cloak
We started emailing back and forth pretty much from the moment I got back to Scotland. We hardly ever talked on the phone; in fact, I remember calling him once from Germany, where I was on tour, about some script issue, and he sounded absolutely thrown to hear my voice. I think he’d forgotten I had one. Anyway, with a 12-hour time difference between L.A. and Edinburgh, email was a practical and successful way of collaborating.

Steve would ask me questions, sometimes about the background of the characters, sometimes on whether something he’d had one of them say or do was consistent with what had happened to them or what would happen. He very rarely took a wrong turn; in fact, I’m struggling to remember any occasion when he did. He had a phenomenal instinct about what each character was about; he always plays that down, but he made some very accurate guesses about what was coming.

Actually, I’ve just remembered the only time he did get something wrong, and it was a funny one. We were at a script read-through for Half-Blood Prince at Leavesden, so for once we were side-by-side in the same room. I hadn’t read the very latest draft, so I was hearing it for the first time. When Dumbledore started reminiscing about a beautiful girl he’d known in his youth, I scribbled DUMBLEDORE’S GAY on my script and shoved it sideways to Steve. And we both sat there smirking for a bit.

I don’t think he ever pushed to know what was coming next. Odd, really, when I look back; except that I’ve got a feeling that as a fellow writer, he understood that I needed some space. There came a point where my bins were being searched by journalists; keeping tight-lipped was a way of giving myself creative freedom. I didn’t want to be tied down by expectations I’d raised; I wanted to be at liberty to change my mind. But I did tell Steve a few things. I used to share what I was doing as I was doing it. I remember emailing him while writing Goblet of Fire and telling him that I had backstory on Hagrid that I wanted to put in, but I was wondering whether it wasn’t too much, given how big the novel was likely to be. He emailed back saying, “You can’t tell me too much about Hagrid. Put it in.” So I did.

Inevitably, things had to be cut between novel and film. It never bothered me. Steve’s a compassionate surgeon. We couldn’t make eight-hour-long films, and I’d rather have had him wielding the scalpel than anyone else.

It’s been an intense relationship, forged under very unusual circumstances. Steve has come closest to being inside the world with me–actually, he has been inside the world with me but always a year or two behind. Nobody else has come close to that. The sheer length of the collaboration has made it unique.

He’s become a great, real friend. I remember, on a subsequent visit to L.A., the two of us ended up in a bar at my hotel, sitting at the only table where we were allowed to smoke, like a pair of pariahs. I said to him: “Do you ever feel like you’ll be found out?” And he laughed and said: “All the time. All the time.” That was the same conversation when he told me Dumbledore was “burdened with knowledge.” So he might not have got Dumbledore’s sexuality right, but he understood something much more fundamental.

These days we don’t need to email for work purposes–we just do it to hang out together in cyberspace. I’m always trying to get him and the family over to Scotland. He’ll fit right in, this sardonic, freckly guy with a nice line in black humor. He tells me he works better when it’s raining; he should buy a holiday home here.
Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 02:04 AM   #26 (permalink)
Members
Murtlap
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Lessons to be taken from Peter Jackson.. THAT is the way to go.
I am sooo not fooled.
Yeah, because Peter Jackson was sooooooooooo completely faithful to the Lord of the Rings.

Quote:
It seems like he pushes Hermione into the forefront with Harry, and shoves Ron into the background. Yeah, I know the actors also have a part to play, literally, but the fact of the matter is, Emma isn't just stealing Rupert's lines... Steve Kloves is giving them to her.
Emma could have no lines in a scene and people would still focus in on her. She doesn't fade into the background, even when she was eleven. Rupert these last few movies has developed as strong a presence onscreen. There are closeup shots of him in DH Pt1 that are compelling and you wonder what his thoughts are.
Fastbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 02:37 AM   #27 (permalink)

Ravenclaw
Puffskein
 
spiral_star's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: teapot!
Posts: 1,294

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Kyoya Blake Barnett
Ravenclaw
Fourth Year
Default
Jeanne Morgan// Virgo Wilson // Draco Malfoy fan

Finally the two meet... awww. i wanna meet Jo too!!!
spiral_star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 03:35 AM   #28 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Red Cap
 
HallowsSeeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 77

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Caretrix Peverell
First Year
Default

JK Rowling rocks!
HallowsSeeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 09:18 AM   #29 (permalink)

Gryffindor
SS Featured Author
Snidget
 
r+h4ever1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Burrow
Posts: 2,923
Default
Fan Fic Queen

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastbak View Post
Well on that one I can say that it reads great in the book but is impossible to do in a movie because Ron's foot is injured. There is no way to stage that bit in real time. Try it. Try to do exactly what it says in the book with Ron standing up to say that line and hold Harry back from going after Sirius. It can't be done.

Also Ron explaining what a "Mudblood" is while vomiting slugs isn't great way to learn that info in a film. I liked that Hagrid was mainly the one to explain it.
We'll agree to disagree then. Because having Ron struggle to get to his feet when injured to stand up to a man he thinks is dangerous to say "If you want to kill Harry, you'll have to kill us too," is not impossible, and it reveals so much about Ron's character and loyalty to Harry. And as for the Mudblood part...the slugs are gross either way. Ron discusses it between bouts of slugs...easily done in films, particularly when Rupert is a great actor.

Anyway, I think that the first two (with the minor exception) were fantastically done, and I enjoyed OotP (not written by Kloves, incidentally) and HBP. And DH1 is my favorite of the franchise so far, especially as Ron is fully canon again, which was fantastic. Kloves got it absolutely right in this last one. I respect the guy. But PoA and GoF are sore spots for me...especially as Hermione became the "second in command" while Ron stood their for comic relief. As Harry himself says in GoF, the book, "Hermione was great, but she wasn't the same as Ron." I just feel like Kloves has never fully shown that through the script.

And that's just it - Rupert Grint is a fantastic actor. In my opinion, he's the best of the three, and he's been able to flex that better in the last two because the script allowed him to do so. I thought he was the highlight of DH1, Emma coming in close behind. But in those 3rd and 4th films, Rupert's talent and Ron's true character were not given the opportunity to shine.

(I hear jumping on the dragon's back will be Hermione's idea in this last one. And let's face it, that's completely out of character as she was terrified in the books. But whatever.)

Anyway, those are my thoughts on the matter. Like I said, I respect Kloves for what he's done in these films. It's not an easy task. But he's lost me along the way a few times. And the maddening thing, for me, is to learn that JKR allowed it, possibly encouraged it; it kind of bums me out.

Shannon
r+h4ever1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 02:14 PM   #30 (permalink)
Members
Horklump
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 44
Default

When JKR first met Steve Kloves, the films obviously weren't made! The fact that he favoured Hermione even then, must have made it look as if he would protect the underdog, which Hermione probably was in terms of likeability at that time.

In the first film, Ron was the most attractive and best acted member of the Trio by far. The rumour is that WB were worried he'd 'outshine' Harry to the detriment of the future films - sadly, none of them had seen Star Wars and how Luke and Han were totally different, so appealed to different people and made the films have an even wider audience. They fell into the sad old trap where they diminished certain characters to build up others - instead of just developing all the characters naturally and letting people make up their own minds. The films made a lot of money, but lots of films have done better - they settled for average products and bucket loads of cash instead of excellent products and vast bucket loads of cash!

So Emmione Sue was born, whose endless studying of weighty academic text books meant that she knew more about day to day life in a completely new world, then someone who'd been bought up in it. Not to mention that breakdown of the filthiest swearwords and their definitions she apparently found in that old Charms book...

Scripts are vital to the success of a film and this has kept the HP films' achievements far too modest in comparison to how much is spent on them. Other departments work their socks off, (apart from the painfully uninspired costume department) but can't overcome the weak storytelling. This is unforgiveable for films based on Harry Potter books. The old 'books are different to films' won't work, either. Yes, lots of things have to be dropped to transfer to a different medium, but a coherent main plot isn't one of them.

I tried to introduce a non-believer to Harry Potter through the Azkaban film. This is his basic reaction. He laughed as Hermione picked up Harry with one hand and through him into the Shrieking Shack - is she a magical creature in disguise, he wanted to know. That upper body strength makes no sense - why didn't she use her wand? Why does Harry think that light across the lake was his dad, if he's dead? That light was a patronus? Why does it look like an animal, unlike the others we saw? Wait, Harry's dad could turn into an animal? Why didn't they mention that when Lupin was saying how much he fancied Harry's mum? Isn't it convenient that Lupin could suddenly realise how to make the map work, just in time to see Peter's name? If he'd read the book instead, none of these questions would have come up - apart from Hermione the super strong gymnast! I had no defence - he was no fan, whining because his favourite part wasn't there. The things missing meant the main plot made no sense.

The directing,editing and especially studio interference have as much to do with this as the persistently ordinary scripting. Heyman was the one consistent character, but it's the money that talks. JKR was still writing the novels - regardless of her contract details, if she'd been openly critical, WB would have jumped to her tune. She was apparently happy with the way things turned out, but I'm not obliged to be. The 'Jo's happy, so we should be' argument doesn't work on me, as I'm a grown up who can make up my own mind!

I think the characterisation failed amongst the children in the films - the bland hero, unrealistically capable Sue and one-note comic relief cypher. Attempts have been made in the later films to change this, only because of plot requirements, but these films made actively dislike Hermione as I'm not a tween and don't care about wish fulfillment. I know what I think and no-one's going to tell me these films aren't an opportunity missed. I can't even bank on remakes either. They'll still need money from a big studio and the same mistakes will probably be repeated. Sigh.
MissRastaban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 04:09 PM   #31 (permalink)
sml
Hufflepuff
Dugbog
 
sml's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 128

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Abigail Adams
Graduated
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissRastaban View Post
In the first film, Ron was the most attractive and best acted member of the Trio by far. The rumour is that WB were worried he'd 'outshine' Harry to the detriment of the future films
Are you serious?! Harry was adorable in those first couple films, and frankly, Rupert was kind of a funny looking little kid (not my words - someone else's, but I agree). He had the perfect face for making all those comedic looks - that's why they did it. I also don't think he's the "best" actor of the three - they all have their strengths and weaknesses - and it does depend on the character. Harry, for example, is on the screen most of the time. He has to do a lot of subtle acting throughout and is often introspective, so you just don't notice it. And really, in that first movie, you couldn't take your eyes off of him he was so cute (and I mean in a "cute little kid" way).
sml is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 04:21 PM   #32 (permalink)
Members
Dementor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 97
Default

Big JKR fan :-) Not such a big SK fan :-(
Marauders' Map is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 04:25 PM   #33 (permalink)
Hufflepuff
Ashwinder
 
Hermionespell's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 13,555
Default
Ultimate Potterite Original original

That's very interesting.
Hermionespell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 04:31 PM   #34 (permalink)
Slytherin
Dugbog
 
crazedHPfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastbak View Post
I can hear the sound of William Goldman laughing at someone saying how powerful a writer is in movies.

I think a good script is the most important thing but I think a director has the final say of what goes up on the screen. Filmmaking is a laborious task and a director doesn't shoot what he doesn't want to shoot. I also think most directors would take advantage of Ron's comedic skills and Emma's star quality to liven a scene.

Another thing, one of a screenwriter's main priorities is to write to an actor's particular strengths. Tom Mankiewicz, who wrote a few of the James Bond movies, said he wrote the character differently when Roger Moore took over from Sean Connery. There were things Sean could say and do but wouldn't be right for Roger and vice versa. I think over time Dan, Rupert and Emma each developed at their own pace as actors. Ron definitely got great as a dramatic actor recently and the script of the latest movie reflects that. The scene where Ron talks Harry out of leaving is a really great scene that wasn't in the book.
All I'm saying is I think the story is important in the Harry Potter movies. It is important with the plot, character development, etc. I suppose they should be making it a movie first, book adaptation second, but that doesn't mean I have to like it.

I know that the writing of a character is influenced by the actor, but what about Rupert's acting made Steve Kloves shove him in the background in the ending scene of Half-Blood Prince? Dan and Emma made the scene great, but would it have hurt anything to give Rupert one line? I mean, Ron had some in the book. The last movie was a real improvement, I just think that in some of the other movies he really didn't do Ron's character justice.
crazedHPfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 04:35 PM   #35 (permalink)
Formerly: Nimmiii
Gryffindor
SS100 Triumphant
Doxy
 
Anum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: on the edge of glory
Posts: 6,032

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Rory Thompson
Gryffindor
Fifth Year
Default
♥ Anissel | Mrs. O'Pry's BFF | Sweet Pea's Lassie ♥ | Laura's Mango | Tycy ♥

Quote:
As odd names on scraps of paper are perennially fascinating to me too, that clinched my feeling that I’d met a kindred spirit.
I melted when I read this So adorable!!
Anum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 06:01 PM   #36 (permalink)
Slytherin
Puffskein
 
ThePureBloodPrincess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Posts: 1,658

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Megara Kostas
First Year
Default

Aww she is such a sweet woman!
ThePureBloodPrincess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 06:34 PM   #37 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Puffskein
 
Looneybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland ❤
Posts: 1,367

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Ferosa "Roe" Collins
Second Year
Default
ℭreative-tastic| ✿ Color Magnet ✿

I know it's hard to accept for a lot of fans because you always wonder who is responsible for some of the horrid changes but the person to blame isn't really Kloves. Kloves really does have good intentions and the script is safer in his hands than anyone else's because he has such a strong connection with Jo. Even though there are times I get angry with him and his changes, you have to remember not everything he writes gets translated onscreen properly. That's the key word. I remember how upset and angry I was when HBP came out; I was frustrated that Ginny's character was so bland and boring, nothing like her fiery self in the books. I blamed Kloves all the way. However, when WB released the script for the Oscars last year, I was shocked to see how Kloves had written the lines, and how badly they'd been translated on screen by the actors/directors. When I was simply reading the script, I heard the voices of the characters from the book, presenting their lines like their canon-selves would. When I imagined the actors, however, the same lines lost their edge because the actors didn't perform them like the characters.

When OotP came out, it was horribly done (and the worst HP movie to date in my opinion) because Kloves wasn't doing the writing. Michael Goldenberg wrote the screenplay and we all saw the consequences of that. He did a good job I suppose but he didn't have that relationship with Jo, which is where I believe the film went wrong. I think if there's anyone to blame for the crappy translation of the story, it's Yates overall. That's the pattern that I've found with the films. Since he's been directing, the films have gone downhill in my opinion. His directing as been improving for each film, (HBP was loads better than OotP because Kloves was back again) but it's nothing compared to the first four films. Before we all jump on Kloves, we should really think of what a hard job he has. He has this huge fanbase to please, yet at the same time he's got to write a decent screenplay in order for the movie to have good reviews and give him credibity as a writer.

Though I will admit, he does have a thing for Hermione which in turn has hurt Ron's character, and ultimitely taken away from reasoning behind the Ron/Hermione relationship.

Last edited by Looneybird; 04-21-2011 at 06:42 AM.
Looneybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 07:01 PM   #38 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Gnome
 
RonaldX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Burrow
Posts: 332

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Ronniekins
Second Year
Default

I think Ron lovers have said enough. WB have to agree that they did not do justice with Ron in movies.
I am okay with Ron in PoA and GoF, but he was seriously laid back in OotP. And I blame yates for this along with Kloves.

Just because Daniel Radcliffe is too hot it does not mean that Harry should get the girl. I don't know why people always come up with looks and forget the chemistry between characters. But hey I'm no Dan hater, I really do like him, I think Hes amazing, but it really hurts me when I see HP franchise full of H/Hr shippers.

To me Ronald Bilious Weasley is the best one of the trio and Ron and Hermione are made for each other. Jo knew the best thats why she put them together. And Kloves gotta understand this.
__________________
“Accio Brain!”
RonaldX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 07:07 PM   #39 (permalink)
Members
Bundimun
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 34
Default

I think people are way too hard on Steve Kloves when it comes to the characters. People, Steve Kloves is just the writer and does NOT have the final word when it comes to how the characters come across. He is not there on set every single day! When the chips are down and the cameras are rolling, it's up to the directors and the actors to interpret the script the way that it is intended. And reading over Steve Kloves's scripts, I DO NOT feel that this was always the case.

For example, Steve Kloves wrote "DUMBLEDORE: Harry, did you put your name in the Goblet of Fire?", but on the actual day of shooting, Mike Newell and Michael Gambon decided to have it go "DUMBLEDORE: HARRYDIDJAPUTYERNAMEINTHEGOBADAFIYAH!!!!!!". And it was also not Steve Kloves's call to have Dumbledore body-check Harry into the cabinet, that's a director decision. Or how about a more obscure one? In POA, in Hogsmeade, Steve Kloves wrote "RON: Shut your mouth, Malfoy!", but Alfonso Cuaron and Rupert Grint decided to have Ron look down and whimper when he said the line, afraid to actually stand up to Malfoy! There are LOTS and LOTS of ways to interpret a line, and Jo only reads the scripts, she's not there every single day on set with the directors either. So if she thought the scripts were good and faithful, then they were good and faithful, and it's the directors and actors who have been having the characters deliver lines in ways that they absolutely wouldn't. Think about every moment with the characters you hate in the films. Is it the actual content of what they're doing or saying that's the problem, or is it the WAY that they're doing it or saying it? Even the dreaded Harry/Hermione dance scene could have been a sweet moment, but Dan's performance and David Yates's direction made it seem like Harry was creeping on Hermione, not simply trying to cheer her up! I can actually only think of time in the whole movie series where a character said a line that in no way could ever be read in a way that the character would actually say it: when Dumbledore looks at the students and says accusingly "Don't you all have studying to do?". Who wrote that? Not Steve Kloves.

Last edited by mr_bellamy; 04-20-2011 at 07:13 PM.
mr_bellamy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 07:10 PM   #40 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Red Cap
 
ladysaraii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 83

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Dahlia Tussaud
First Year
Default

I think overall his scripts have left a lot to be desired. I know there is director influence in there as well, but I really don't think Kloves did a good job in bringing out a lot of things about HP
__________________

Your flavour is salad dressing. You're an independent person and
likes to enjoy the simplicities of life. You've always found witty as funny.
You tend to be drawn to energy. The brighter the colours the better, you say. ♥
ladysaraii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 07:32 PM   #41 (permalink)
Members
Bundimun
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladysaraii View Post
I think overall his scripts have left a lot to be desired. I know there is director influence in there as well, but I really don't think Kloves did a good job in bringing out a lot of things about HP
No, I agree, his scripts are not the greatest. I think that a lot of his storytelling in the scripts is very muddled and confusing, and that he doesn't bring out a lot of the great themes from the books as well as he could. But those are my big script problems, and they are not the things that I always hear Kloves getting bashed over and over again for. If there is one thing that I think the scripts got well, it's the characterizations, and it's the ACTING and DIRECTING that has not always lived up to that. The thing is that I always hated Kloves because of the characters, but I realized that each time I revised the movie's characters in my own head, I found over and over that I was actually always imagining them still saying the same words from the movie, but just in a completely different way.
mr_bellamy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 12:10 AM   #42 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Jobberknoll
 
Ginny GL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mexico.
Posts: 4,063

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Ginny
First Year
Gryffindor

I don't agree with some of the adaptations the production, especially Mr Yates made him do, but he's a brilliant play writer, and a very smart guy.
Ginny GL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 12:42 AM   #43 (permalink)
Hufflepuff
Puffskein
 
iwantorlando05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bama
Posts: 1,191

Hogwarts RPG Name:
unsorted
Default

I love the way JK Rowling writes! I get a warm, tingly feeling every time I read something she's written. She's amazing!

Hermione has always been my favorite character! I love her!
iwantorlando05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 02:17 AM   #44 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Jarvey
 
reina9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 622

Hogwarts RPG Name:
GinnyWeasleyPotter
First Year
Default

Quote:
“You know who my favorite character is?” I looked at him, red hair included, and I thought: You’re going to say Ron. Please, please don’t say Ron–Ron’s so easy to love. And he said: “Hermione.”
yes, he doesn't have to say it. i already knew from the look of the movie. they should have titled it Hermione Granger & the Deathly Hallows. or maybe he's in-love with emma . can't tell

Quote:
I wish Steve Kloves could of kept some R/Hr moments in the HP movies rather than H/Hr.
although i have seen a lot of R/Hr, i would have to agree with you on that part.

@AcrazedHPfan, i do agree 100% on that.

i don't complain with the POA because mostly that's what in the book. it's 95% from the book. I love what they did with POA. (he had done it without any bias on that one, why can't he do it with the rest of the movies?)

and yes, mostly ron's line were stolen

what made me so angry about is they made ron being on the third-wheel (in terms of friendship)

Last edited by reina9; 04-21-2011 at 02:49 AM.
reina9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 07:07 AM   #45 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Puffskein
 
Looneybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wonderland ❤
Posts: 1,367

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Ferosa "Roe" Collins
Second Year
Default
ℭreative-tastic| ✿ Color Magnet ✿

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_bellamy View Post
For example, Steve Kloves wrote "DUMBLEDORE: Harry, did you put your name in the Goblet of Fire?", but on the actual day of shooting, Mike Newell and Michael Gambon decided to have it go "DUMBLEDORE: HARRYDIDJAPUTYERNAMEINTHEGOBADAFIYAH!!!!!!"

Even the dreaded Harry/Hermione dance scene could have been a sweet moment, but Dan's performance and David Yates's direction made it seem like Harry was creeping on Hermione, not simply trying to cheer her up!
Thank you! My point exactly. That line in GoF always bothered me, even after all these years because it completely ruined the whole point of Dumbledore's character.

Same with the dance scene. They got it past Jo by telling her it was about friendship and if you read the script only and knew their character backgrouds, then you'd believe it was about friendship only. However, as I recall, when they had the ABC family previews last month, they had a video on the dance where Yates talked about how for a second Harry lusted after Hermione and had feelings for her. No words were said in that scene so it was free to interpretation whatever which way for the film makers, which they seized upon for another Harry/Hermione moment. It's all about delivery. The writing isn't always the case and that's why I feel as if we need to lay off of Kloves and give him some slack. After all, he wrote the first two films and most fans rarely ever had a problem with it. In my opinion, those films were perfect.
Looneybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 07:40 AM   #46 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Snidget
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 2,751
Default

Nice..
__________________
R-Luchy~W*7*PG~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 12:58 PM   #47 (permalink)
Members
Dementor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 97
staffed shop

Quote:
Originally Posted by Looneybird View Post
I remember how upset and angry I was when HBP came out; I was frustrated that Ginny's character was so bland and boring, nothing like her fiery self in the books. I blamed Kloves all the way. However, when WB released the script for the Oscars last year, I was shocked to see how Kloves had written the lines, and how badly they'd been translated on screen by the actors/directors.
I am genuinely curious: Can you give some specific examples of lines that Kloves wrote for the character of Ginny in HBP that would have demonstrated Ginny's fiery side if the "actor" had not delivered those lines "badly"? I ask because it is my impression the Bonnie Wright has actually done a really good job with the paltry lines and scenes that Kloves and Yates have given her. I mean, consider this: Harry and Ginny are supposed to be the loves of each others' lives -- "soul mates" according to JKR -- and yet Kloves has not given them a single line in which the couple expresses their feelings for each other or talks with each other about their relationship. It's kind of hard to demonstrate chemistry when you are given literally zero lines with which to express your feelings. Harry does have one scene in HBP in which he talks about what he is feeling for Ginny but that scene is with . . . wait for it . . . Hermione. And there is that one scene at the end there where he talks about snogging Ginny, but, oh yeah, that scene is with . . . Hermione. If there is one thing that Kloves and Yates can't get enough of, it's Hermione.

Last edited by Marauders' Map; 04-21-2011 at 02:31 PM.
Marauders' Map is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 04:20 PM   #48 (permalink)
Members
Horklump
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sml View Post
Are you serious?! Harry was adorable in those first couple films, and frankly, Rupert was kind of a funny looking little kid (not my words - someone else's, but I agree). He had the perfect face for making all those comedic looks - that's why they did it. I also don't think he's the "best" actor of the three - they all have their strengths and weaknesses - and it does depend on the character. Harry, for example, is on the screen most of the time. He has to do a lot of subtle acting throughout and is often introspective, so you just don't notice it. And really, in that first movie, you couldn't take your eyes off of him he was so cute (and I mean in a "cute little kid" way).
Yes, I'm totally serious. I'd never judge a child by his looks - I'm not so shallow. I certainly don't think looks are anything but a pleasant extra - they're certainly no substitute for a good performance. I meant Ron's was the more attractive character by far. Harry can be quite wry in the books, but that doesn't come across in the films. Remember, when I said Ron was the best actor, I was talking about the first film (though I still think he is the best of a very modestly talented trio.)

In the first film (indeed all of them, imo) Dan frequently doesn't act unless he's actually speaking. He seems a really great person in real life, but I do watch him very carefully and he still often doesn't react if he's not directly involved - we'll have to agree to disagree on that. I hear he's very good on stage, but am not interested in seeing him there. I can only judge him by Harry Potter. Apparently he and Emma had an 'understanding' during filming of the third film, which did come across. However, by Phoenix, any screen chemistry was history, and the Horcrux kiss, as with Cho and Ginny,was hardly convincing. (Emma did try, I admit!) In their little dance, it didn't come across as either platonic or romantic. The way he was looking at her was quite creepy and off putting.

Also, just because Rupert can make funny faces, doesn't mean he should constantly do so. This wasn't a Nativity play starring and directed by a bunch of 10 year olds. The scriptwriter/Director should have tried to create well rounded three dimensional characters out of all of them. They had proof of Rupert's ability, yet made some uncreative decisions.

Back on topic, I agree we can't be sure how many of Ron, Harry and even Dumbledore's stolen lines were given to Hermione by Kloves or by Directors etc. Some of them have to be the script, because there was nothing about Emma's acting that justified her part being enlarged to that extent while on set. The films changed Hermione from a developed character who was accademically brilliant and clung to that to hide her insecurities about other things, to a typical fan fiction Sue. Her character suffered as much as Ron's, despite her getting extra attention. However some people think number of lines is more important then developing a genuine character. In later films, in order to fit into the plot, both characters are all over the place. The filmmakers may not have originally known how the story would end, but surely that was more reason to try to be as true to what was in the book? Also, Kloves did know more than most about what would happen, so why did the scripts not reflect that knowledge of characters and events?

I said in my first post that the film makers/financiers have to share the blame. Even a good script can be sabotaged by them. However, no matter how well the lines are (or aren't) delivered, these aren't good scripts. The humour is usually cheesy and unlike the source material, the dialogue is average, no matter who's delivering them and it's a shame.

Last edited by MissRastaban; 04-21-2011 at 04:26 PM. Reason: Extra point made
MissRastaban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 08:00 PM   #49 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 9
Default

Always great to hear more off Jo.
aylnfx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 11:51 AM   #50 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Mooncalf
 
phoenix_tears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Underwater (:
Posts: 6,570

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Charles Fitzgerald
Fifth Year
Default
Heart keeper ♥ l Rawrrr ll domestïc equïne ll cherryy''

I always really liked Kloves, and I think he'd done a really good job on the Harry Potter adaptations! It was after I watched OotP, that I fully appreciated Kloves' adaptations of the Harry Potter movies because I was very dissapointed with the movie at the time it first came out. (Yes, I think that Goldenberg had done a bad job adapting the movie, although it might not be his fault entirely, he is a good writer after all.) And I'm really glad to know that Jo got along with him really well.

I agree with Yasmin up there about how the movies had gone downhill after Yates started directing. It's absolutely not Kloves' fault how some of the scenes turned out to be. I really loved the first four movies which were the best in my opinion.
__________________

Palm trees, Ocean breeze ..
Salt air, Sun bleached hair ..
Endless Summer; Take me there .. ♥

Last edited by phoenix_tears; 04-24-2011 at 12:00 PM.
phoenix_tears is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:23 PM.


This Harry Potter and Wizarding World fan website and community is not endorsed by Hogwarts, Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling, Warner Bros., Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Quidditch, Deathly Hallows, Sorcerer's Stone, Wizards, Muggles, No-Maj, MACUSA, Newt Scamander, Video Games, Half-Blood Prince, Orders of the Phoenix, Goblet of Fire, Philosopher's Stones, Chamber of Secret, Pottermore, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, Eddie Redmayne, Cursed Child, or any other official Harry Potter source.

All content is copyright ©2002 - 2025, SnitchSeeker.com unless stated otherwise. Privacy Policy

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Site designed by Richard Harris Design

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256