View Single Post
Old 06-16-2020, 01:17 AM   #4 (permalink)
PhoenixRising



Quintaped
 
PhoenixRising's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: in my head [GMT-6]
Posts: 58,994

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Jasmine Springer (#229a36)
Graduated

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Emma Montmorency (#301199)
Hufflepuff
Sixth Year

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Kartik Ishaan Joshi (#3112da)
Ravenclaw
Seventh Year

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Kara Walsh (#aa1506)
Gryffindor
Second Year

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Tiffany Rose
Slytherin
Fourth Year

x12 x8
Default
YesJess! | Captain Goggles | Mama Badger | Eva's Soul Sister | An OG™ | It's all in the Numbers

I agree with you, Ariana, on the actual need for LESS houses than more.... already we are having existential crises with house identities.... if there was a fifth to add to the mix, i'd imagine the house identity crisis would be even worse.

Although I do like the idea of a fifth house representing this void and for those who are true hatstalls, but then again, wouldn't that contribute more to the house identity crisis?

But yea i definitely think we evolve over time and one house that might fit us as an eleven year old might not fit us 5 or 10 years later. Like for me, i was CERTAIN my topsy turvy house would be Ravenclaw, but I think maybe a dozen years ago if i would have done this quiz, it would have been and yet as I've gotten older, I've definitely developed more Ravenclaw-esque ways.

Which also makes me think, if we do evolve and change from our house ... perhaps sorting into cunning, witty, bravery, loyal, are not the best measures to use ....?? Is there another way that we can judge people? To differentiate them? Is using something similar to myers-briggs worthwhile? Obviously not 16 houses because that would be ridiculous, but something similar
__________________

___________________You should take your little finger and just point it in the mirror.
________________________________________Baby, maybe you're the problem
PhoenixRising is online now   Reply With Quote