SnitchSeeker.com - View Single Post - Oscar-nominated makeup team talk changes in Deathly Hallows: Part 2 epilogue reshoots

tomj321 · 02-25-2012, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Romine

"Dan Radcliffe had a gray wig. Rupert had a receding wig with little bits of gray in it"

uhm sorry, but they are around 37 or 38 in the Epilogue. Really wondering who came up with this Idea. I know some People are getting gray Hair early, but isn't this rare?
Imo it was really the best Idea ever that they did a Reshoot for the Epilogue. The Make Up looked so much better. Rupert looked really old at first

Everyone kind of overreacted to the makeup in the first epilogue shoot. I don't really think people can judge about that first shoot seeing as only a few crappy photos were ever seen. I saw them in the flesh at Kings Cross when they were filming it and I thought they looked ok and probably would have been even better under correct lighting and stuff. The makeup wasn't THAT bad (it's definitely not unheard of for someone in their mid 30s to have some grey or receding hair), they just reshot some of it to improve it. And they actually said one of the reasons they did it was because the on-location environment wasn't ideal for the actors, especially the kids. I think they also did it because they wanted to change the content of the scene slightly as well.

02-25-2012, 01:04 AM	#4 (permalink)
tomj321 Dugbog Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: UK Posts: 109	newshound Quote: Originally Posted by Romine "Dan Radcliffe had a gray wig. Rupert had a receding wig with little bits of gray in it" uhm sorry, but they are around 37 or 38 in the Epilogue. Really wondering who came up with this Idea. I know some People are getting gray Hair early, but isn't this rare? Imo it was really the best Idea ever that they did a Reshoot for the Epilogue. The Make Up looked so much better. Rupert looked really old at first Everyone kind of overreacted to the makeup in the first epilogue shoot. I don't really think people can judge about that first shoot seeing as only a few crappy photos were ever seen. I saw them in the flesh at Kings Cross when they were filming it and I thought they looked ok and probably would have been even better under correct lighting and stuff. The makeup wasn't THAT bad (it's definitely not unheard of for someone in their mid 30s to have some grey or receding hair), they just reshot some of it to improve it. And they actually said one of the reasons they did it was because the on-location environment wasn't ideal for the actors, especially the kids. I think they also did it because they wanted to change the content of the scene slightly as well.