SnitchSeeker.com - View Single Post - New Daniel Radcliffe LA Times photo shoot, full Esquire UK, Apple Store interviews

goldenGryffingirl · 02-13-2012, 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by masterofmystery

I have to admit, out of all the interviews he's done to promote Woman in Black (and God knows I've been keeping track), the Esquire feature was the one that kind of left me half-wondering if I should bother posting it - not because he swears in it (he does that all the time), but because of how offensive some of those anti-American comments came across. A part of me wondered if the reporter didn't lead Dan to openly rant the way he did, twist some of his words (not the direct quotes), or if there was a particular trigger for his comments. It was an uneasy thing to read, I gotta admit, but I suppose he - like everyone - is entitled to his (somewhat pretentious) opinion.

I dont get it at all. I met him once, after a showing of HTSIBWRT, and the young man I met seemed like a completely different person than the one in this interviews- as he seems to find problem with a LOT of things.
he says he doesn't like pretentious people but then a lot of his comments come across like that.

one would think after the huge mess that was the interview about him not keeping in touch all the time with rupert, which he did apologized, explained himself- he would think twice before talking...

*sights* I just can't think of a single reason why he would say what he says here, and hoping he sees sense and explains himself soon.

02-13-2012, 06:04 AM	#8 (permalink)
goldenGryffingirl Murtlap Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 57	Quote: Originally Posted by masterofmystery I have to admit, out of all the interviews he's done to promote Woman in Black (and God knows I've been keeping track), the Esquire feature was the one that kind of left me half-wondering if I should bother posting it - not because he swears in it (he does that all the time), but because of how offensive some of those anti-American comments came across. A part of me wondered if the reporter didn't lead Dan to openly rant the way he did, twist some of his words (not the direct quotes), or if there was a particular trigger for his comments. It was an uneasy thing to read, I gotta admit, but I suppose he - like everyone - is entitled to his (somewhat pretentious) opinion. I dont get it at all. I met him once, after a showing of HTSIBWRT, and the young man I met seemed like a completely different person than the one in this interviews- as he seems to find problem with a LOT of things. he says he doesn't like pretentious people but then a lot of his comments come across like that. one would think after the huge mess that was the interview about him not keeping in touch all the time with rupert, which he did apologized, explained himself- he would think twice before talking... sights I just can't think of a single reason why he would say what he says here, and hoping he sees sense and explains himself soon.